Absolutely fundamental to negotiation is our ability to persuade others to accept our view. In 350BC, Aristotle identified that persuasion was “the art of getting people to do something they would not ordinarily do if you did not ask”. It is a shifting of attitude, of getting the other party to move their position closer towards yours. As such it has a profound effect on negotiation and conditioning. He identified three types of proof used by highly persuasive speakers:
The most effective persuasive messages carry a blend of all three.
How does this manifest itself in today’s negotiations? The fact is it all holds as true today as it did 2300 years ago!
(Ethics) is a measure of the credibility or respect that the negotiator has in the eyes of the other party. The other party will measure this by trustworthiness, authority, reputation and expertise.
(Emotions) is the emotional appeal of your argument (verbal and non-verbal). This can be both positive (warm emotive) or negative (coercive). Rich analogies, storytelling and humour are all powerful emotional themes which have a profound effect on the other party’s perceptions.
(Factual Information) is synonymous with logical argument. This can involve the use of facts, statistics and evidence. There is often no shortage of this to support both sides of the argument (witness the recent EU Referendum). The key is to make it understandable, logical and real.
There are two key lessons to draw from this: